Pages: [1] 2 3 |
1. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mike Azariah wrote: 5) What I want to see. PLAYERS, not accounts, people. If there is a bomber wing (come on boys . . . wooohoohoo) I want to know it is eight guys working in unison. I like watching a football match (soccer) but I get far les...
- by Yi Hyori - at 2014.11.27 07:24:41
|
2. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
TigerXtrm wrote: Capt JJ wrote: But under the new EULA conditions Fleet / Squad / Wing warps are bannable. As they come into navigation of multiple accounts with a single click. Yes its built into the game but it is NOT excluded or has prov...
- by Yi Hyori - at 2014.11.27 02:15:00
|
3. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Teckos Pech wrote: Yi Hyori wrote: Teckos Pech wrote: Yi Hyori wrote: I half agree with Nolack Ataru in that this type of change may lead to headaches for GMs who are sometimes poorly trained and inadequately equipped to handle certain...
- by Yi Hyori - at 2014.11.27 01:32:02
|
4. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Teckos Pech wrote: Capt JJ wrote: But under the new EULA conditions Fleet / Squad / Wing warps are bannable. As they come into navigation of multiple accounts with a single click. Yes its built into the game but it is NOT excluded or has pr...
- by Yi Hyori - at 2014.11.27 01:29:06
|
5. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Teckos Pech wrote: Yi Hyori wrote: I half agree with Nolack Ataru in that this type of change may lead to headaches for GMs who are sometimes poorly trained and inadequately equipped to handle certain situations. Hence my post in requestin...
- by Yi Hyori - at 2014.11.27 01:01:27
|
6. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Teckos Pech wrote: Nolak Ataru wrote: For the thousandth time, the accelerated gameplay clause is on a PER. TOON. BASIS. CCP themselves have stated this. If the clause was on a per-human basis, CCP would have to ban all forms of multi-a...
- by Yi Hyori - at 2014.11.27 01:00:28
|
7. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I half agree with Nolack Ataru in that this type of change may lead to headaches for GMs who are sometimes poorly trained and inadequately equipped to handle certain situations. Hence my post in requesting better training and preparation for GMs...
- by Yi Hyori - at 2014.11.27 00:55:08
|
8. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nolak Ataru wrote: Yi Hyori wrote: Believe it or not, there are CCP devs that use the ISBoxer program for their playstyle as well. As I understand, they are quite familiar with the intricacies of ISBoxer and how the program works. I believe ...
- by Yi Hyori - at 2014.11.27 00:20:20
|
9. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Blackhole's Revenge wrote: Why doesn't CCP create access for controlling multiple accounts on their terms, so it can still be done but with less automation? You can't take away controlling 5-10 accounts. Say I have 3 accounts all used for comb...
- by Yi Hyori - at 2014.11.27 00:18:51
|
10. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nolak Ataru wrote: Volcane Nephilim wrote: Yi Hyori wrote: . As for those over privileged players arguing against multiboxing, needs to take a strong look at their arguments. Are you arguing because you truly feel that multiboxing in its...
- by Yi Hyori - at 2014.11.27 00:04:16
|
11. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Telistra wrote: Thank you for your detailed response to my sarcasm that the developer might just adjust just his/her software. It was well thought out and very articulate, and has done nothing for my current opinion. :-) The entire point...
- by Yi Hyori - at 2014.11.27 00:01:33
|
12. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Alexandr Ranger wrote: excuse me will broadcast char selecting,docking and logging off be banned? things like this doesn't seem to have an impact on the EVE universe Docking yes, logging in and off no. According to the original post made...
- by Yi Hyori - at 2014.11.26 23:54:34
|
13. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Volcane Nephilim wrote: Yi Hyori wrote: . . As for those over privileged players arguing against multiboxing, needs to take a strong look at their arguments. Are you arguing because you truly feel that multiboxing in its truest form is ( ie...
- by Yi Hyori - at 2014.11.26 23:52:28
|
14. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
RenoIdo wrote: o/ As someone who multiboxed 4 ships to pvp in lowsec over the last year, I see people in this thread aren't realising a few things. If I'm flying 4 ships I am risking 4 times more isk than 1 ship, I am subject to 4x as much m...
- by Yi Hyori - at 2014.11.26 23:26:57
|
15. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Hafwolf wrote: I have read it. I am asking if this is correct interpretation of the word. I run 3 account in eve I use eve window helper or IS boxer to see my screens. My understanding is that doing this is now wrong. I ask the GM for some cl...
- by Yi Hyori - at 2014.11.26 23:17:47
|
16. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Telistra wrote: I can see it now... ISBoxer Development Patch Notes: Added new input delay timer to for broadcasts I don't think you understand how much Lax works on ISBoxer to stay compliant with the games that support the us...
- by Yi Hyori - at 2014.11.26 23:08:44
|
17. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I cannot believe I read every post in this thread. I feel as though I am going to get cancer from this, but I thought it would be prudent to read all of the opinions expressed in this thread before expressing my own. I am neither for nor against...
- by Yi Hyori - at 2014.11.26 01:30:36
|
18. Musings of a Hisec Miner - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
shhh besides the point :P he made a personal point at chribba saying how others laugh at him as their wallets fill faster. i dont know of any individual who could make that claim :P I'm sitting comfortably at around 200b or so in liquid and asse...
- by Yi Hyori - at 2014.11.10 18:46:49
|
19. Musings of a Hisec Miner - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Dave Stark wrote: Chribba wrote: I'm ready. tl;dr? Miners the lowest tier... and yet everyone needs us. I laugh at them as they fill my wallet /c and they laugh at you as theirs fills faster. if you have even 1% of Chribba's asset...
- by Yi Hyori - at 2014.11.10 17:11:33
|
20. [Suggestion] Give the Revelation a resist bonus like the Phoenix - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I can get behind this. Revs are pretty bad though in general. Something something vertical superiority. ( Even though I fly Moros and Phoenix )
- by Yi Hyori - at 2014.11.05 15:38:47
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |